<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FizzBlog - Word of Mouth Marketing &#187; Beer Business Daily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fizzcorp.com/blog/beer-business-daily/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fizzcorp.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:52:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Contest: Best Un-Approvable Beer Name</title>
		<link>http://fizzcorp.com/blog/contest-best-un-approvable-beer-name/</link>
		<comments>http://fizzcorp.com/blog/contest-best-un-approvable-beer-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Monica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beer Business Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beer Industry Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beverage marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fizz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word of mouth marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fizzcorp.com/blog/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could win a ticket to the 2010 Beer Industry Summit worth $1100! Simply come up with the best beer name that would never get approved by the Alcohol Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) and you’ll be on your way to one of the largest beer events in the industry! About the Conference The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>You could win a ticket to the 2010 Beer Industry Summit worth $1100! Simply come up with the best beer name that would never get approved by the Alcohol Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) and you’ll be on your way to one of the largest beer events in the industry!<br />
<h3>About the Conference</h3>
<p>The conference gathers 500 professionals from the beer industry to the Wild Horse Pass Resort &amp; Spa in Phoenix, AZ from February 28th to March 1st to talk about the biggest issues in beer. Join our own Ted Wright as he and a panel of industry veterans talk about how to use word-of-mouth marketing to generate crazy growth rates for your brands! Other major topics of discussion at the Summit include:
<ul>
<li>Latino beer drinkers and how to reach them</li>
<li>Distributor consolidation</li>
<li>What’s driving craft beer growth…</li>
</ul>
<p>And much more!<br />
<h3>How to Enter</h3>
<p>Come up with the best beer brand name that would never get approved by the TTB. Bonus points for sending a mockup label to go with your beer name or doing anything else that we think is funny. Email your entry to BeerSummitContest@fizzcorp.com by Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 11:59pm Eastern Standard Time (EST) with “Beer Summit Ticket” as the subject line. Yep, it’s that simple.Entries will be judged on the following criteria:
<ul>
<li>Humor</li>
<li>Cleverness in breaking rules</li>
<li>Unapprovability</li>
<li>General wit</li>
</ul>
<p>Entries will be judged solely by the team at Fizz (herein known as “Fizz”). All entry decisions are final and at the sole discretion of Fizz. The winner will be contacted on February 5, 2010 via the email address the entry is submitted with.<br />
<h3>Contest Rules (a.k.a. “The Fine Print”)</h3>
<p><small>NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PURCHASE WILL NOT IMPROVE CHANCES OF WINNING.All winners must be 21 years of age or older, unless otherwise stated and/or posted.</small><small></small><small></small><small><br />
<h4>1. Entering Contests and Choosing and Contacting Winners</h4>
<p>Entrants must send entries using the correct contest entry email address, subject line, and any other specific entry information requested in the contest announcement. Fizz is not responsible for and will not consider incomplete or incorrect entries or emails sent but not received by Fizz for any reason, as potential contest winners.Only one entry per email address used to send the email will be considered for contest entry, unless multiple entries are specifically allowed in the contest posting. Unless otherwise specified in an individual contest post, no person may enter any contest more than once using multiple email addresses.Once a winner is selected and notified, failure to respond by the response date shall mean that the winner forfeits the prize. Fizz is not required to award elsewhere any prizes forfeited by the chosen winner(s).</small><small><br />
<h4>2. Submission of photo, text or other content for Contests</h4>
<p>Entries selected for display and to win “best of” contests and any other contests requiring photo, text or other content from the entrants will be judged entirely at the discretion of Fizz.By submitting any photo or information to Fizz, you hereby grant to Fizz and its affiliates, subsidiaries, licensees and assigns, an irrevocable, perpetual and royalty-free right to use, reproduce, edit, display, transmit, prepare derivative works of, modify, publish and otherwise make use of the submitted photo or other information in any and all media, whether now known or hereinafter created, throughout the world and for any purpose. The rights granted to Fizz include but are not limited to the right to resize, crop, censor, compress, edit, feature, caption, affix logos to, and to otherwise alter or make use of the submitted photo.By submitting any photo or information to Fizz, you hereby represent and warrant that the submitted photo or information does not and shall not infringe on any copyright, any rights of privacy or publicity of any person, or any other right of any third party, and you have the right to grant any and all rights and licenses granted to Fizz herein, including but not limited to all necessary rights under copyright, free and clear of any claims or encumbrances.You acknowledge and agree that Fizz shall have no obligation to post, display or otherwise make publicly available any photo or information submitted by you, and may, in its sole and unfettered discretion, remove, edit, modify or delete any photo or information that you submit to Fizz.You understand and intend that any photo or information submitted by you to Fizz may be available for viewing, rating, review and comment on by the public, and understand that comments or ratings with which you disagree or are unhappy about may be published or otherwise become associated with any photo or information you submit to Fizz. By submitting any photo or information to Fizz, you hereby waive any privacy expectations that you may have with respect to any such photo or information submitted by you to Fizz.You hereby agree to hold Fizz and its affiliates, subsidiaries, licensees sponsors and assigns harmless from and against, and hereby waive any right to pursue, any claims of any nature arising in connection with the inclusion in, publication via or display on any Fizz site, or any other use authorized under these Terms, of any photo or information submitted to Fizz by you.Photos or information submitted by you shall be the property of Fizz, and Fizz shall have no obligation to preserve, return or otherwise make available to you or others any photos or information so submitted.</small><small><br />
<h3>3. Awarding Prizes</h3>
<p></small><small>Winners are solely responsible for all taxes and/or fees that may be incurred.Winners may not request substitutions of prize winnings. All winners are solely responsible for any and all taxes and/or fees, and all such additional costs that may be incurred.</small><small>Fizz, Fizz clients, and employees of Fizz or its clients may not be held liable for any warranty, costs, damage, injury, or any other claims incurred as a result of usage of any winners of a prize once possession has been taken of the product by winner. Fizz is not liable for any loss arising out of or in connection with or resulting from any contest promoted by Fizz.</small><small>If the specified prize becomes unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, Fizz may substitute a prize of like or equal value.</small><small>Management, employees and families of Fizz are prohibited from winning any prizes awarded by Fizz.</small><small>Fizz reserves the right to alter any rules of any contest at any time.</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fizzcorp.com/blog/contest-best-un-approvable-beer-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are TV spots the &#8220;heroin&#8221; of advertising?</title>
		<link>http://fizzcorp.com/blog/are-tv-ads-the-heroin-of-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://fizzcorp.com/blog/are-tv-ads-the-heroin-of-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beer Business Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beverage marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MillerCoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pabst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainier Beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WOMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word of mouth marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fizzcorp.com/blog/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Perhaps the other big news to come from the meeting was the creation of TV ads for Blue Moon.&#8221;  The quote above is from the reporting by our good friends at Beer Business Daily. We have gotten several e-mails from other friends in the beer industry asking about what we thought about this new move [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="background: white; color: black"><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">&#8220;</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">Perhaps the other big news to come from the meeting was the creation of TV ads for Blue Moon.&#8221;</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"> </span></span></font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="background: white; color: black"><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">The quote above is from the reporting by our good friends at <a href="http://www.beernet.com/">Beer Business Daily</a>. We have gotten several e-mails from other friends in the beer industry asking about what we thought about this new move so we thought we&#8217;d post some thoughts here. </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"> </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"><a href="http://www.bluemoonbrewingcompany.com/">Blue Moon</a> has such a strong base of WOM that harnessing the power of broadcast now makes sense.  </span></span></font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="background: white; color: black"><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">At Fizz we are agnostic about tactics but fundamentalist that marketing must be about interesting, relevant and authentic conversations with consumers. Most TV does not do this. If Blue Moon&#8217;s TV does, then great. Perhaps these commercials will do for Blue Moon what the Duck spots did for AFLAC &#8211; take a product built on word of mouth and turbo charge growth by harnessing the power of broadcast. Some of the people here at Fizz used TV to great effect when they helped PBC rejuvenate the Rainier brand in the Pacific NW.  RainierVision, the name of the campaign, worked because the TV spots were created to spark brand right conversations not just shout at people. </span></span></font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="background: white; color: black"><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"><a href="http://www.beernet.com/issues/bbd/11_422/news/1929-1.html">Beer Business Daily </a>also quotes MillerCoors that while Blue Moon outsold Sam Adams in 2008, 90% of those gains came from distribution gains. These are both interesting facts given MC’s move into TV with Blue Moon. </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"> </span></span></font><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="background: white; color: black"><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"> </span></span></font><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="background: white; color: black"><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">Here at Fizz, we have great love for the Blue Moon folks. Some of us were out there when the entire team could fit in a small widowless conference room and have many chairs left empty. Since then, that team has pulled off one of the great big company beer campaigns in the last ten years. </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"> </span></span></span></font><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="background: white; color: black"><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"></span> </span></font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="background: white; color: black"></span></font><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="background: white; color: black"></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: 15.6pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; background: white; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">In the final analysis Fizz believes that TV ads are a lot like heroin - really effective at the beginning but the need for ever increasing amounts to maintain the same level (of &#8220;high&#8221; or &#8220;sales&#8221;, you pick), makes them ultimately destructive. AB is the most recent example of this. Let’s hope Blue Moon doesn’t get hooked. </span></p>
<p></span></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fizzcorp.com/blog/are-tv-ads-the-heroin-of-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beer Business Daily interview with Ted Wright on WOMM and beer</title>
		<link>http://fizzcorp.com/blog/beer-business-daily-interview-with-ted-wright-on-womm-and-beer/</link>
		<comments>http://fizzcorp.com/blog/beer-business-daily-interview-with-ted-wright-on-womm-and-beer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beer Business Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beverage marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Kovalchuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dogfish Head]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drinkability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fizz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flying Dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neal Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pabst blue ribbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WOMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word of mouth marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fizzcorp.com/blog/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Beer Business Daily. January 27, 2009  IS WORD OF MOUTH MARKETING THE NEW KILLER BEER APP?   Last week we caught up with Ted Wright, who is the managing partner at Atlanta-based Fizz, a word of mouth marketing firm.  Ted has worked on brands from Pabst Blue Ribbon to chocolate milk, and has based his firm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"><font face="Times New Roman">From<a href="http://www.beernet.com/"> Beer Business Daily</a>. January 27, 2009 </font></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"><font face="Times New Roman"><strong>IS WORD OF MOUTH MARKETING THE NEW KILLER BEER APP?</strong> </font></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="color: black">Last week we caught up with Ted Wright, who is the managing partner at Atlanta-based Fizz, a word of mouth marketing firm.  Ted has worked on brands from Pabst Blue Ribbon to chocolate milk, and has based his firm on the data showing that mass media is out and viral, word of mouth marketing is in.  Here is a short excerpt of our talk, with a longer piece coming in MBA.</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"></span></font><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="color: black">TED ON FOUR STEPS TO SUCCESSFUL WORD OF MOUTH.  &#8221;Prior to doing this whole thing we said, okay, there&#8217;s four steps to this:  focus, design, delivery, and report. Those are the four steps to making a great word of mouth campaign. The first step is &#8220;focus&#8221;, and that&#8217;s really coming up with a story that is interesting, relevant, and authentic. If a story is interesting, relevant and authentic, it will get passed around.  Stories that fail on any of those three points, don&#8217;t get shared.  I know everyone&#8217;s talking about [Bud Light's] Drinkability these days.  To us, Drinkability is a failure as a marketing campaign, because it is inauthentic. Is Bud Light authentically more drinkable about than any other light beer?  Saying Bud Light has Drinkability is like a Hyundai saying you can drive their cars to work. Duh, it&#8217;s a car! Other than the externalities out there, like Lamborghini, I could drive almost any car to work.  The same is true for beer, they all have &#8216;Drinkability&#8217;. People don&#8217;t actively share stories that they think are inauthentic. &#8220;   </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"> </span></font><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="color: black">ON THE DEATH OF TV.  &#8221;Our data shows that when a friend shares a story with another friend the listener will go and spend his/her own money to try that product 93 times out of 100.  Television gets someone to buy a specific beverage brand about seven times out of 100. Print is even worse. The C-suite can do the math and this is what is driving them to word of mouth marketing. Dogfish Head and PBR are good beer examples. Tito&#8217;s vodka, Izze soda, Monster energy drink and VeeV are other beverage brands that have taken advantage of word of mouth marketing. Tito&#8217;s went 1,000 cases a year to about 225,000 cases a year all on word of mouth.   The fact is that the average North American consumer is bombarded with 6,300 commercial messages a day.  That&#8217;s just too many so people tune out everything.  When the story outside the bottle matches what&#8217;s going inside the bottle, and the story is interesting, relevant and authentic, then the story is shared. Consumers sharing of stories = an increase in brand share.&#8221;</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"> </span></font><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="color: black">ON PBR&#8217;s EARLY SUCCESS.  &#8221;I know that you personally, Harry, keep mentioning retro and PBR. But I would like to tell you that retro has got little, if anything, to do with PBR&#8217;s success.  I think the authentic story about PBR is authenticity itself. Let me tell you why.  PBR at a certain point in its life stopped spending money on broadcast advertising. They went about 15 years and did not do much broadcasting at all. Times changed and PBR stayed true to it&#8217;s roots. Not because they had some over arching philosophy but because they didn&#8217;t spend money on much marketing at all. PBR found many of it&#8217;s accounts had been rediscovered by &#8220;hipsters&#8221; and their salesmen kept doing what they had always been doing, Sansabelt slacks and all.  These bars were now populated by people who grew up and were born in the &#8217;80s and rejected what they saw as a materialistic way of living. They were saying, &#8216;you guys did all that yuppie stuff, I think that&#8217;s not real. I think that&#8217;s fake, and I&#8217;m going to go and seek those things that are real.&#8217;  Since PBR didn&#8217;t have any money, by default, all they could do was things that were authentic.  Salesmen went around,  wore their Sansabelt slacks, and they said, &#8220;Hey, I really like my beer, you should buy my beer. If you don&#8217;t like it, that&#8217;s cool too.  That&#8217;s how they were selling. So we basically took that ethos of, this is who we are, and we&#8217;re going to celebrate things that are authentic.  Brian [Kovalchuk, former Pabst chief] and Neal [Stewart, former PBR brand manager, now at Flying Dog] bought off on this idea, and we all kind of came up with this together. </span></font><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="color: black"> </span></font><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="color: black">&#8220;We could have gone the &#8216;red, white and blue&#8217; route, we could have gone &#8216;Americana&#8217;. There was also a whole PBR/trucker hat/retro kind of thing happening. We intentionally did not do the retro thing, because retro is a fad, and celebrating the authentic is a choice.  We want to work with choices not fads.  Brian, Neal and the rest of the team, us included, created a program around the twin ideas of word of mouth marketing and a brand ethos of &#8220;authentic&#8221;. In was mini-Kiss, low rider bikes, turning washing machines in to beer coolers and Vice magazine parties. Out was anything we deemed inauthentic like Kid Rock or plastic promo girls. We wanted to be involved with anything that people were doing because they liked doing it. By going out there and supporting people that are authentic, and not asking anything of them in return some asked about our brand. The more we shared with them, the more they liked it. Some liked it so much that decided to spread the word like a Baptist preacher in a tent. With a lot of hard work by Pabst staff, agency folk, distributors and fans of PBR the brand has grown into the phenom it is today.&#8221;<span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"> </span></span></font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: 10pt; color: black"><em>Thanks to the good folks at BBD for the interest in WOMM and Fizz &#8211; ed.</em></span></span></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fizzcorp.com/blog/beer-business-daily-interview-with-ted-wright-on-womm-and-beer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

